Case 2604241/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Smith v Built Environment Consulting Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604241/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flint Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a wholly remote hearing conducted by video on 16 April 2021 before Employment Judge Flint. The claimant, Ms S Smith, was assisted by her father, Mr Smith, and the respondent, Built Environment Consulting Ltd, was represented by its director, Mr M Faulkner.
The tribunal upheld a single claim for unlawful deduction from wages. It found that the deduction consisted of holiday pay and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £682.41 net.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The decision therefore records the outcome and the sum awarded, but does not set out further findings or legal reasoning in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages, identified as holiday pay, and ordered payment of £682.41 net. | Upheld | — | £682 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £682
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.