Case 2604250/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Singhal v Platinum (L) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604250/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Singhal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Ahmed on 12 February 2021 in case 2604250/2020. The extracted text records that the claim succeeded.
No liability reasons or monetary award are set out in the judgment text supplied. The tribunal directed that remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing on Friday 26 February 2021 at 11.00 am, listed with a time estimate of 3 hours.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 default judgment; the extracted text records that the claim succeeds but does not break down findings or remedy between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 default judgment; the extracted text records that the claim succeeds but does not break down findings or remedy between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment; the extracted text records that the claim succeeds but does not break down findings or remedy between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Rule 21 default judgment; the extracted text records that the claim succeeds but does not break down findings or remedy between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.