Case 2604253/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bishop v Freight Management European Limited FINAL HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604253/2020
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bishop
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Camp heard the case at Nottingham on 16 December 2021. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give Mr A Bishop sufficient notice of termination of employment. That breach was identified, but the tribunal assessed the claimant's damages for breach of contract at nil, so no monetary recovery followed on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the reason for dismissal was not redundancy. On that basis, Mr Bishop was held not to be entitled to a redundancy payment. No other claims, legal tests, or remedy components were identified in the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give the claimant sufficient notice of termination of employment, but assessed damages for breach of contract at nil. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the reason for dismissal was not redundancy and held that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.