Case 2604280/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss W Phillips v MNE Accounting Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604280/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham - Hybrid
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss W Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment is a short case management decision, not a substantive liability judgment. Employment Judge Blackwell adjourned the case to 25 August 2021 because it appeared unlikely that the proceedings could be concluded on 13 July 2021, principally because of disclosure of documents that the tribunal considered relevant to the proceedings.
The judgment records agreed findings of fact that, since the foundation of Sigma Accounting Solutions Ltd, Miss Phillips had been the only shareholder and held 100% of the shares; that there was no written contract of employment between Sigma and Miss Phillips; that RSB Accountancy Practice Ltd ceased to trade in 2018; and that Sigma purchased the premises at Hempshaw Lane, NG6 8PF.
No substantive tribunal findings on the pleaded claims, and no remedy award, are recorded in this decision. The tribunal stated that orders for the resumed hearing were set out in a separate document.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment is a case management decision only. It adjourned the case to 25 August 2021 and did not determine any substantive claim or remedy. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.