Case 2604417/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Abbott, Solicitor For the v Karting (Mansfield) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604417/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Abbott, Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent did not attend and was not represented at the final hearing. Employment Judge R Clark sat alone.
The claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of notice succeeded, and the tribunal awarded a gross sum of £4,387.32. The claim for a statutory redundancy payment also succeeded, with a redundancy payment of £13,250.
The tribunal further upheld the claim for statutory compensation for unused annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, awarding £1,165 for accrued but untaken annual leave. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim in respect of notice succeeded. | Upheld | — | £4,387 |
| Redundancy | Claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded. | Upheld | — | £13,250 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for statutory compensation for unused annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,165 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,802
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.