Case 2604428/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Allen v Latty International Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604428/2020
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 29 January 2021 Employment Judge Swann issued a Rule 21 judgment in Mr J Allen v Latty International Limited. The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
The extracted text is a short template decision and does not set out separate findings on the pleaded heads of claim, compensation, or any liability reasoning beyond the Rule 21 outcome. It also states that the hearings listed for 17/03/21 and 27-29/06/22 were cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text is a short Rule 21 decision and does not set out separate liability findings for this head of claim; the case listing identifies disability discrimination, and the judgment records that the claim succeeds with remedy to be determined later. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text is a short Rule 21 decision and does not set out separate liability findings for this head of claim; the case listing identifies unfair dismissal, and the judgment records that the claim succeeds with remedy to be determined later. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.