Case 2604514/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Somel v Ridge Surveyors Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2604514/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Somel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ahmed sat alone at Leicester on 2 and 3 February 2022. The tribunal recorded that, by consent, Ridge Surveyors Ltd had made an unlawful deduction of wages and ordered the respondent to pay Mr R Somel £1,057.43 net in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also dismissed any outstanding complaint in respect of breach of contract. No separate remedy was recorded for that complaint.
Mr Somel's complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the Respondent was found to have made an unlawful deduction of wages and was ordered to pay £1,057.43 net. | Upheld | — | £1,057 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dismissed any outstanding complaint in respect of breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,057
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.