Case 2700427/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Agnes Dabi v Aker Solutions Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2700427/2015
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Agnes Dabi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Agnes Dabi had brought proceedings in 2700427/2015 alleging unfair dismissal, dismissal on the grounds of public interest disclosure, sex discrimination and race discrimination. The tribunal recorded that those claims had been struck out by a judgment of Employment Judge Hill on 2 February 2016, with the written record sent on 26 February 2016. In the 2019 judgment, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto treated the later claim number 3331146/2018 as the same case, based on the same facts and matters.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The 2019 judgment treated this as part of the same claim set already struck out in 2015/2016 and struck out the reissued proceedings in 3331146/2018 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to the earlier claim as dismissal on the grounds of public interest disclosure; the 2018 reissued claim was struck out as the same case already determined. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim was part of the same claim bundle that the tribunal found had already been determined and struck out earlier. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination claim was part of the same claim bundle and was struck out together with the other reissued claims. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- res judicata
- cause of action estoppel
- rules 70-72 reconsideration
- interests of justice
- R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.