Case 2703621/2011 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Kariuki v Reading Borough Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 2703621/2011
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Kariuki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of any substantive employment claim. Instead, it dealt with case management and strike-out. By a letter dated 4 March 2021, the tribunal gave Miss E Kariuki an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The tribunal struck the claim out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the tribunal's letter dated 4 March 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.