Case 2804329/2009 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Bluff Bluff & Others (see the attached schedule) v Bolsover District Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2804329/2009
- Decision date
- 20 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Bluff Bluff & Others (see the attached schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment covers the linked case numbers in which Mrs A Bluff Bluff and the other named claimants brought proceedings against Bolsover District Council. The decision dated 20 February 2019 states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants.
The short judgment does not set out any factual findings, evidence, merits reasoning, or remedy assessment. No substantive determination was made on the underlying equal pay and sex discrimination issues because the claims were withdrawn.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claims in detail; claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claims in detail; claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.