Case 3200016/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Sedgwick v BT Fleet Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200016/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Sedgwick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R Sedgwick was the claimant and Bt Fleet was the respondent. The only substantive disposal stated is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings on the merits are recorded in the extracted text, and the judgment does not set out any factual findings, legal analysis, or liability determination. It is therefore not possible from the judgment text to identify a substantive outcome beyond withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.
The extracted text also does not specify any monetary award, remedy, or apportionment between claims. No legal test is named in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive determination is given and no specific claim type is identified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.