Case 3200020/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Cristian Turc v Salt Restaurant — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200020/2024
- Decision date
- 29 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge I Comfort Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Cristian Turc
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge I Comfort, sitting at East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 29 April 2024, heard the claim of Mr Cristian Turc against Salt Restaurant. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages to be well-founded and it succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total sum of £2,890, comprising £1,360 for unpaid wages and £1,530 for accrued holiday pay covering the period 8 March 2023 to 10 October 2023. Payment was ordered to be made within 14 days of the date the order was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded; £1360 awarded for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £1,360 |
| Holiday pay | £1530 awarded for accrued holiday pay for the period 8 March 2023 to 10 October 2023. The judgment groups this within the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint; classified separately here as a holiday pay component. | Upheld | — | £1,530 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,890
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.