Case 3200022/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrei Pronin v NGE Contracting Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200022/2023
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrei Pronin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Andrei Pronin’s unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and found that he had been unfairly dismissed by NGE Contracting Limited. The judgment records the liability outcome only and does not set out any remedy figure in this decision.
The tribunal dismissed Mr Pronin’s claims for unlawful deduction of wages, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, and holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations, finding each of those claims not well founded. A separate remedy hearing was listed for 25 July 2023 to determine the remedy issues arising from the unfair dismissal finding.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability judgment only; remedy was listed for a separate hearing on 25 July 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was described as breach of contract (notice pay). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim was for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.