Case 3200029/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Burcin v Mission Cafe Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200029/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Burcin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 January 2021, Employment Judge Moor ordered Mission Cafe Limited to pay Mr D Burcin £898.63 gross in arrears of pay, the figure being £1,498.63 less £600 in respect of contractual deductions. The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £931.00 for accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment.
The claimant's claim for unpaid expenses was struck out. The respondent's claim for breach of contract failed. The extracted judgment does not record any further reasoning beyond those outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £898.63 gross in arrears of pay, described as £1,498.63 less £600 in respect of contractual deductions. | Upheld | — | £899 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered £931.00 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £931 |
| Other | The claimant's claim for unpaid expenses was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's claim for breach of contract failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,830
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.