Case 3200036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Aiden Mozejiko v Out of the Storm Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200036/2020
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Aiden Mozejiko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a one-page judgment in which Employment Judge G Tobin recorded that the claimant, Mr Aiden Mozejiko, did not attend the hearing at East London Hearing Centre on 19 August 2020. The respondent, Out of the Storm Limited, appeared through its director, Mr D Oyston.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the dismissal complaint.
No remedy was awarded or quantified in the judgment. The decision is dated 20 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant did not attend the hearing on 19 August 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.