Case 3200039/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E King v London Fire Commissioner — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200039/2023
- Decision date
- 19 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a firefighter and presented unfair dismissal and race discrimination complaints on 11 January 2023, after his dismissal and internal appeal. The tribunal refused his application to amend the race discrimination claim, finding that the new allegations were new factual complaints, were outside the primary time limit, would require new witness evidence, and that the balance of prejudice weighed against allowing the amendment.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal accepted that initial trade union advice meant it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim until shortly after the internal appeal outcome. It found, however, that after the unsuccessful appeal the claimant knew the relevant facts and that the tribunal time limits were tight, and that the ICO complaint did not prevent him presenting an employment tribunal claim in parallel. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore struck out as out of time.
On race discrimination, the tribunal considered the broader just and equitable extension test. It treated the merits as neutral, but found the delay lengthy, that there was no good reason for much of the delay after the appeal, and that recollections of decision makers might be impaired to some extent. It concluded that the claimant had no reasonable prospect of persuading a tribunal to extend time and struck out the race discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had no reasonable prospect of showing the claim was brought in time or that time should be extended. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The application to amend the race discrimination claim was refused. The race discrimination claims were struck out because the claimant had no reasonable prospect of showing they were brought in time or that time should be extended. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- no reasonable prospect of success
- little prospects of success
- Singh v Post Office [1973] ICR 437
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.