Case 3200040/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Durojaiye v Source247 Recruitment Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200040/2019
- Decision date
- 21 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Durojaiye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for accrued but untaken paid holiday outstanding on termination of employment. The respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal noted that the claim had been allowed to proceed out of time at a preliminary hearing and then determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the available material, including oral evidence from the claimant.
On the facts found, the claimant’s holiday year began on 20 April 2018, the start of his employment, and his employment ended on 14 September 2018 after 21 weeks and 1 day. The tribunal found that he took no paid holiday during his employment. It also found that he did not have a contract for regular hours, although he worked 5 days per week, so his net weekly pay was calculated by averaging the 12 payslips provided, resulting in £411.74.
Applying regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1996, the tribunal calculated the compensation for accrued but untaken holiday on termination as 5.6 x 21.14/52 x £411.74, which produced £937.37. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant in that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal allowed the claim to be presented out of time at a preliminary hearing and determined it on the material before it. | Upheld | — | £937 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £937
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £937
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.