Case 3200046/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Allan v Adams Textiles — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200046/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Allan worked for Adams Textiles as a sales assistant from 12 February 2018 until redundancy on 9 December 2019. The tribunal found the parties had a net-to-gross arrangement: the claimant was to receive £66 net per day, and the respondent was responsible for calculating and paying the tax. On that basis, the tribunal held that tax rebates and changes in tax levels generally belonged to the employer rather than amounting to deductions from wages payable to the claimant.
The holiday claim succeeded. The tribunal found the claimant's holiday entitlement was 28 days inclusive of bank holidays. It accepted that he had sufficient notice of the shop closures for bank holidays and the five Jewish holiday closures, so those days could be treated as holiday taken. The claimant was therefore entitled to 50.25 days' unpaid holiday, and the tribunal awarded £3,316.27.
On the tax rebate issue, the tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to tax rebates arising during the employment under the net-to-gross arrangement, and his wider unlawful deduction allegations based on tax changes did not succeed. The exception was a rebate of £119.20 relating to a previous employment: the respondent was entitled to retain £68.40 for tax it had paid in the first two weeks of this employment, but had to pay the balance of £50.80. The respondent's counterclaim for £835.40 said to be overpaid wages was dismissed. The total award was £3,367.07.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Partly upheld. The tribunal found the respondent improperly retained the balance of a tax rebate of £119.20 relating to a previous employment, after allowing £68.40 for tax paid in the first two weeks. Other unlawful deduction points, including later tax rebates, personal allowance changes, and the pension/student loan deductions, failed. | Upheld | — | £51 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for 50.25 days' unpaid holiday succeeded. The tribunal found the claimant's holiday entitlement was 28 days including bank holidays and that he had sufficient notice of the bank holiday and Jewish holiday closures so they could count as holiday. | Upheld | — | £3,316 |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim for repayment of £835.40 said to be overpaid wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,367
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.14 ERA 1996
- Agarwal v Cardiff University and anor 2018 EWCA Civ 2084
- implied term in fact
- business efficacy test
- officious bystander test
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A, 14 and 15
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.