Case 3200051/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J McGhie v Medso Group and MDCare Group — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200051/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J McGhie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal after writing to her on 26 June 2024 and giving her an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The reason identified was that she did not appear to have the necessary minimum service under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996, and she was asked to provide representations by 15 July 2024.
The claimant replied that it had been a mistake on her part. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim and therefore struck it out. The judgment records that the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim would be listed for a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have the necessary minimum service under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.