Case 3200056/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Ajith v Department for Work and Pensions — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200056/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs A Labinjo, Dr J Ukemenam
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Ajith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, who had breast cancer accepted by the Respondent as a disability, brought claims of discrimination arising from disability. The alleged unfavourable treatment concerned her non-selection for Team Leader roles at Barking, the award of a performance rating of 2 rather than 1 for 2017/18, the handling of her grievance by Ms Comben, and the grievance and appeal outcomes.
On time limits, the Tribunal found that the Team Leader appointment complaint was out of time but extended time on just and equitable grounds. The performance rating, grievance, and grievance appeal complaints were treated as part of a continuing state of affairs and were within time.
On the merits, the Tribunal found no prima facie link between the Claimant's disability-related absence, or uncertainty about that absence, and the Team Leader decisions or performance rating. It accepted the Respondent's explanations that stronger candidates were selected for Team Leader and that the Claimant's rating reflected performance that was good but not exceptional in all respects, including feedback from Mr Misbah.
The Tribunal also found that the choice of grievance manager was not unfavourable treatment and, in any event, was accepted not to have been influenced by sickness absence. It accepted non-discriminatory explanations for the grievance and appeal outcomes, including Ms Comben's continued view on the grading and HR advice about the grievance process. The disability discrimination claims therefore failed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claims of discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 concerning failure to appoint to Team Leader roles, a 2017/18 performance rating of 2 rather than 1, conduct of the grievance, and grievance and appeal outcomes. All failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.140B Equality Act 2010
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Hendricks
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Pnaiser v NHS England
- Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
- Hardys & Hanson v Lax
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.