Case 3200056/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L White v Carters of Suffolk Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200056/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elgot Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L White's claim against Carters of Suffolk Limited was listed before Employment Judge Elgot at the East London Hearing Centre on 29 May 2020. Neither party was present or represented at the hearing.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had written on 26 May 2020 confirming that a settlement had been reached and that she no longer wished to pursue her claim. The judgment therefore disposed of the case under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment contains no findings on the merits and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive cause of action. It records that the claimant wrote on 26 May 2020 confirming that a settlement had been reached and that she no longer wished to pursue the claim, and the tribunal dismissed it upon withdrawal under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.