Case 3200057/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Craughwell v Ms M Amankwah and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200057/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms N Craughwell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Craughwell brought a claim for unpaid wages. At the hearing on 8 August 2022, Employment Judge Moor recorded that the claim against the First Respondent, Ms M Amankwah, was dismissed. The judgment also amended the Second Respondent's name to Women Like Me International Limited.
The tribunal found that the claim for unpaid wages against Women Like Me International Limited was well-founded and succeeded. The judgment does not set out a detailed factual narrative or legal analysis, but it clearly records liability on the unpaid wages claim against the Second Respondent.
The tribunal ordered the Second Respondent to pay the Claimant £418.25. No separate split between different heads of loss is given in the judgment, and no other remedy components are identified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim against the First Respondent is dismissed, and that the claim for unpaid wages against the Second Respondent is well-founded and succeeds. The Second Respondent is named as Women Like Me International Limited. | Upheld | — | £418 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £418
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.