Case 3200061/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Imranul Hoque v 1) Ashleigh Chessel 2) Marshall Cooper 3) Michelle Gunner 4) Fiona Worrell 5) Samantha Stanley 6) Laura McKenna 7) FALCK UK Ambulance Service 8) Graham Jolly 9) Dan McCullough — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200061/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Prichard Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 26 June 2019, before Employment Judge Prichard, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's discrimination complaints against the respondents at a preliminary stage. It dismissed the complaints said to cover the period from 30 April 2018 to 6 August 2018 as out of time under s.123, recording that there was no clear discernible continuing act and that it was not just and equitable to extend time.
The tribunal then struck out the remaining discrimination claims arising from 12 September 2018 to 5 February 2019 under Rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment states that this concluded the tribunal proceedings, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaints said to arise between 30 April and 6 August 2018 as out of time under s.123, finding no clear discernible continuing act and declining to extend time. The remaining discrimination claims arising from 12 September 2018 to 5 February 2019 were struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) for no reasonable prospect of success. | Other | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaints said to arise between 30 April and 6 August 2018 as out of time under s.123, finding no clear discernible continuing act and declining to extend time. The remaining discrimination claims arising from 12 September 2018 to 5 February 2019 were struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) for no reasonable prospect of success. | Other | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.