Case 3200067/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Keogh v TCH Housing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200067/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Keogh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms S Keogh, brought a breach of contract claim against TCH Housing Ltd. The respondent was not represented and did not attend. Employment Judge Wilkinson found the claim well founded and allowed it.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £406.00. The judgment describes this as the amount due on the claimant's invoice dated 18 March 2020 together with interest at 8% per annum from the date of invoice to the date of hearing. The extracted text does not break the award into separate principal and interest components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was well founded and allowed. It orders payment of £406.00, described as the amount due on the claimant's invoice of 18 March 2020 and interest at 8% per annum from the date of invoice to the date of hearing, but the text does not separate the principal and interest figures. | Upheld | — | £406 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £406
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.