Case 3200071/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hands v Markham and Smith Motor Engineers Ltd. — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200071/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hands
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not contest liability for unfair dismissal, and the tribunal held that Mr J Hands was unfairly constructively dismissed when he resigned on 12 November 2021 after the incident on 10 November 2021 involving Mr Jason Tarling. The tribunal accepted that the assault was unprovoked, that Mr Tarling later pleaded guilty to assault on 24 March 2022, and that the incident caused Mr Hands mental health injury, including stress, anxiety, panic attacks and depression.
The tribunal did not accept that the claimant had proved physical injury sufficient to explain his claimed prolonged inability to work. It relied on the resignation letter, the immediate fit notes, the emergency department record, the lack of supporting GP detail until 27 May 2022, and the fact that Mr Hands was able to carry out some MOT testing work. It therefore limited immediate loss of earnings to 12 November 2021 to 30 April 2022, when it found he could and should have started looking for work again.
Remedy was assessed on that basis at £11,733.84 for 24 weeks' net wages, plus £500 for loss of statutory employment rights and £68.90 for incident-related expenses, giving £12,302.74 before uplift. The tribunal applied a 25% uplift because the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures had not been followed, and it did not make any Polkey or contributory fault deduction. It also rejected any future loss claim and declined to reduce the award for supposed state benefits.
The accrued holiday pay claim failed because the tribunal accepted the evidence that the final payment on or around 26 November 2021 already included 10.5 days' accrued holiday pay, with two further days paid ex gratia for Christmas 2021. The tribunal gave credit for £590.68, leading to a final amount payable of £16,963.75. It recorded that there was no separate breach of contract notice-pay claim, no costs application and no recoupment issue.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent did not resist liability. The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly constructively dismissed on 12 November 2021 after an unprovoked verbal and physical assault by Mr Jason Tarling on 10 November 2021. It accepted that the incident caused mental health injury and limited the recoverable loss of earnings to 30 April 2022, then added a 25% ACAS uplift. The final payable total was reduced by a £590.68 credit for holiday pay already paid. | Upheld | — | £16,964 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had already been paid for 10.5 days of accrued leave in his final salary payment and allowed credit for an additional two days' ex gratia holiday pay, so the accrued holiday pay claim did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,964
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,176
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,303
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- failure to mitigate losses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.