Case 3200099/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Avedian v Lebara Service Centre Limited NOTICE OF CORRECTION EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS RULES OF PROCEDURE 2013 Under the provisions of — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200099/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Avedian
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe supplied document is a Notice of Correction, not the underlying Remedy Reconsideration Judgment. Employment Judge Burgher states that, under Rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, clerical mistakes are being corrected in the judgment sent to the parties on 10 October 2022.
The only substantive correction identified in the text is that the date ‘19 October 2019’ is replaced with ‘23 - 25 January 2024’. No other factual findings, claim outcomes, liability conclusions, or remedy figures appear in the supplied text.
Because the extracted text contains only this clerical correction, the underlying claims and any remedy awarded in the substantive judgment cannot be reliably extracted from this document alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied text is only a Rule 69 notice of correction to a Remedy Reconsideration Judgment. It does not set out any substantive claim, finding, or separate remedy determination. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 69 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.