Case 3200107/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Culff v Independent Homes Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200107/2022
- Decision date
- 23 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Culff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 11 August 2022, the Tribunal gave Ms A Culff an opportunity to explain why she had not attended the hearing on 11 August 2022 and to make representations against strike out for failure to pursue her claim. She was given until 25 August 2022 to respond or to request a hearing.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to respond, or failed to make sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The reasons record that the hearing listed for 5 to 7 July 2023 would not take place.
No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action. It records only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not respond sufficiently to an order dated 11 August 2022 requiring her to explain her non-attendance on 11 August 2022 and to address a possible strike out for failure to pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.