Case 3200135/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Kaur v The Urswick School — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200135/2023
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in East London before Employment Judge Gordon Walker sitting alone on 19, 20, 21, 22 and 26 November 2024, the tribunal held that the claimant’s victimisation claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010 succeeded only in relation to allegations 6(I), (III), (IV), (V), (VI), (VIII), (XIII) and (XIV). The tribunal also found that those victimisation complaints were presented within the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010.
The remaining victimisation allegations were dismissed as not well founded. The separate claim of maternity discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010 and the claim of direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 were also dismissed.
The judgment records that the respondent must pay the claimant the agreed sum of £13,000. No separate apportionment of that sum between the claims is given in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Succeeded only in relation to allegations 6(I), (III), (IV), (V), (VI), (VIII), (XIII) and (XIV); all other victimisation allegations were dismissed. The tribunal held the victimisation claims were presented within the section 123 Equality Act 2010 time limit. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The section 18 Equality Act 2010 maternity discrimination claim was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The section 13 Equality Act 2010 direct sex discrimination claim was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 18 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.