Case 3200144/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Jones v Lloyds Pharmacy Clinical Homecare Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200144/2021
- Decision date
- 3 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Shulman Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant’s contract dated 1 May 2018 provided for an annual salary of £18,500 for a 37.5-hour week. After she requested flexible working during maternity leave, the Respondent approved a move to 25 hours per week on a salary of £23,100 FTE, and internal paperwork and correspondence in August and September 2019 recorded that figure as full-time equivalent pay. The Claimant said she had been told she would receive £23,100 without pro-rating, but the tribunal found her evidence about the conversations with Ms King vague and less reliable than the documentary record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held there was no unlawful deduction from wages on 1 December 2020 because the Respondent was correcting an earlier overpayment and the Claimant's pro-rated salary at 25 hours remained £16,666 based on £25,000 FTE. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Smith v Hughes [1871] LR 6 QB 597
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.