Case 3200146/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Norman v LPW (Europe) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200146/2021
- Decision date
- 9 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Norman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Norman had been made redundant and given 12 weeks' notice, expiring on 20 March 2020. He was off sick throughout the notice period and received statutory sick pay only. At an earlier hearing on his redundancy-payment claim, Judge Elgot had observed that his notice pay had not been correct, and Mr Norman said he was told he would need to bring a new claim without delay.
Employment Judge Housego accepted Mr Norman's evidence that he did not know, before 24 November 2020, that he should have been paid full pay during the notice period. The tribunal found that he had no reason to suspect an error, that he contacted the respondent on 26, 28 and 30 November 2020 without receiving a substantive response, that he began early conciliation on 3 December 2020, and that he issued the claim on the day he received the EC certificate. Applying the approach in Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy [2019] EWCA Civ 2490, the tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary time limit and that it was brought within a further reasonable period.
The respondent accepted in discussion that the correct notice pay should have been full pay and that SSP had been paid in error. The tribunal concluded that Mr Norman was entitled to expect his employer to pay the correct amount, that he was not to be criticised for not checking the position earlier, and that the claim therefore succeeded. It awarded £4,467, calculated as gross notice pay of £5,598 less £1,482 already received; the tribunal noted that the payment would not be run through payroll and that Mr Norman would have to account for any tax due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid notice pay/full pay during the notice period. The tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the normal three-month period and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. | Upheld | — | £4,467 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,467
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable / further reasonable period
- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy [2019] EWCA Civ 2490
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.