Case 3200146/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Ramos v Mother Hubbard’s East Ham R1 Zan Ahmed R2 — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200146/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Ramos
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment under rule 37. It said that by letter dated 17 August 2023 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 23 March 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim being struck out, and it records no remedy or substantive findings on the merits.
The judgment is dated 22 August 2024 and was sent to the parties on 30 October 2024. It is signed by Employment Judge Quill.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with an earlier order and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.