Case 3200149/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Stephen Slater v Precision Printing Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200149/2021
- Decision date
- 16 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
- Venue
- London East Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Stephen Slater
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 16 July 2021 at London East Hearing Centre, Employment Judge S Knight found that Precision Printing Ltd unfairly dismissed Stephen Slater. The judgment records no other liability findings beyond unfair dismissal, and the parties were both unrepresented and in attendance.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £12,850.79. For the purposes of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996, it stated that the total monetary award for unfair dismissal was £12,850.79, of which the prescribed element was £12,350.79 covering 22 August 2020 to 16 July 2021. The amount by which the total award exceeded the prescribed element was £500.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant and ordered payment of £12,850.79. It recorded a prescribed element of £12,350.79 for 22 August 2020 to 16 July 2021, with the balance of £500 outside the prescribed element. | Upheld | — | £12,851 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,851
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,351
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.