Case 3200154/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jesuisa Cassandra v DOCSOL Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200154/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Townley Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jesuisa Cassandra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Townley heard the matter at East London Hearing Centre on 10 June 2022. The judgment records that the claimant, Mrs Jesuisa Cassandra, brought a claim described as breach of contract/fraudulent misrepresentation in relation to her salary, together with claims for injury to feelings and for continued loss of earnings after the termination of her employment. All three were found not well-founded and were dismissed.
The judgment also records that Mrs Cassandra was ordered to pay a contribution to the respondent's costs in the sum of £25. No claimant compensation or award is set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment described this as a claim for breach of contract/fraudulent misrepresentation in relation to salary. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment listed a separate claim for injury to feelings. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment listed a separate claim for continued loss of earnings after the date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.