Case 3200162/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Brooks v Mark Penn DEFAULT — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200162/2020
- Decision date
- 28 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Brooks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response to Mr C Brooks's claims. Under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge Burgher issued judgment in the claimant's favour in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered payment of £2,120.65 in total. That sum comprised unpaid wages of £1,557.92, unpaid holiday pay for 3 days of £138.60, and a 25% ACAS uplift of £424.13. The extracted judgment is a short default judgment and does not set out any further substantive findings beyond the respondent's non-response and the resulting award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment; award for unpaid wages of £1,557.92 formed part of a total that also included a 25% ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £1,558 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 default judgment; award for 3 days' unpaid holiday pay of £138.60 formed part of a total that also included a 25% ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £139 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,121
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,697
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.