Case 3200177/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Skermer v Avo Distribution Group Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200177/2024
- Decision date
- 15 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Park Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Skermer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Skermer appeared in person. Avo Distribution Group Limited (in voluntary liquidation) did not attend the hearing, which took place by CVP at East London Hearing Centre on 15 May 2024 before Employment Judge S Park. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, notice pay and holiday pay all succeeded.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay gross compensation of £4,583.33 for one month's unpaid wages, £1,057.69 for one week's notice pay, and £2,115.38 for 10 days' holiday pay. No separate award for interest, basic award, compensatory award or injury to feelings was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as one month's unpaid wages; no separate legal label is given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £4,583 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as notice pay; no separate legal label is given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £1,058 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to this as 10 days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,115 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,756
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.