Case 3200181/2024 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr Damien Turek 3200181/2024 (2) Mr Piotr Cabala 3200298/2024 (3) Mr Grzegorz Ciupka 3200301/2024 v Housechoice Heating Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200181/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Illing Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr Damien Turek 3200181/2024 (2) Mr Piotr Cabala 3200298/2024 (3) Mr Grzegorz Ciupka 3200301/2024
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThree claimants (Mr Turek, Mr Cabala and Mr Ciupka) brought complaints against two respondents. The tribunal found that the claimants were employed by the second respondent, Housechoice Ltd., and that the first respondent, Housechoice Heating Ltd., had only paid the claimants' tax to HMRC on behalf of the second respondent. The complaints against the first respondent were therefore not well-founded and were dismissed.
The complaints against the second respondent succeeded. The tribunal held that the second respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimants' pay contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for the pay periods ending 31 October 2023 and 27 November 2023, and had also failed to pay holiday accrued but not taken as at the end of employment on 27 November 2023. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was also well-founded, the claimants each having been entitled to one month's notice; notice pay was awarded gross as Post Employment Notice Pay. Mr Ciupka was additionally awarded £700 for a consequential financial loss flowing from the breach of contract.
The tribunal made no award under the Acas Code of Practice because the claimants did not have two years' service and the Code did not apply to their dismissal. Where tax has not been paid in full the respondents remain jointly and severally liable to HMRC, and Housechoice Ltd. was ordered to pay the sums within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The hearing was conducted by CVP at the East London Hearing Centre and the respondents did not appear.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All complaints against the first Respondent (Housechoice Heating Ltd.) were not well-founded and were dismissed. The tribunal found the claimants were employed by the second Respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Against the second Respondent (Housechoice Ltd.). Unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 for pay periods 1-31 October 2023 and 1-27 November 2023. Awards: Mr Cabala £3,912 net; Mr Turek £4,194 net; Mr Ciupka £5,131.82 net. Sum is the combined wages award across the three claimants. | Upheld | — | £13,238 |
| Holiday pay | Against the second Respondent. Unauthorised deduction in respect of holiday accrued but not taken as at the end of employment on 27 November 2023. Awards: Mr Cabala £1,307.77 net (13.6 days); Mr Turek £1,617.89 net (16.2 days) — note the §13 remedy summary records Mr Turek's holiday pay as £1,687.89, an apparent discrepancy in the judgment; Mr Ciupka £1,661.64 net (13.6 days). Sum uses the figures from §7. | Upheld | — | £4,657 |
| Breach of contract | Against the second Respondent. Notice pay (one month each): Mr Cabala £2,500 gross; Mr Turek £2,500 gross; Mr Ciupka £2,916.67 gross. Awarded gross as Post Employment Notice Pay; tax/NI to be deducted before payment. Additionally Mr Ciupka was awarded £700 net damages for financial loss consequent on the second Respondent's breach of contract. Total combines notice pay and Mr Ciupka's £700 consequential loss. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,512
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.