Case 3200182/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Wilkin v Harold Wood Pre School Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200182/2025
- Decision date
- 13 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedMs G Wilkin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Moor heard this matter at the London East Hearing Centre in public by video on 13 August 2025. The claimant Ms G Wilkin was represented by her partner Mr Wakefield; the respondent (Harold Wood Pre School Limited) was represented by its director Mrs Fenn.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. The breach of contract / wrongful dismissal complaint was also upheld, with damages of £1,276.31 (6 weeks' gross pay at £212.71/week). The unlawful deduction of wages complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
For unfair dismissal, the Tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,595.32 (6 complete years' service, 3 years over age 42, at gross weekly pay of £212.71) and a compensatory award of £627.00 (3 weeks' net pay at £209/week for the period 10 January to 31 January 2025). Total monetary award £3,498.63. The recoupment regulations apply only to the £627 compensatory award and only to any post-28 January 2025 increase in the claimant's UC.
Claims and outcomes
3 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £2,222 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Upheld | — | £1,276 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,499
- Basic award
- £1,595
- Compensatory award
- £627
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.