Case 3200183/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Nigel Sargeant v Clapton Park Management Organisation Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200183/2024
- Decision date
- 18 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Misra KC
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr. Nigel Sargeant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment issued on 7 January 2025 by Employment Judge Misra KC in the case of Mr Nigel Sargeant against Clapton Park Management Organisation Limited and Mr Jagdish Kumar. The judgment records that, by an order dated 16 October 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued by 4 pm on 8 November 2024.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute.
The hearing listed for 15 to 18 July 2025 was vacated as a result of the strike out. No remedy was awarded and no legal test was set out in the short written reasons beyond the non-pursuit basis for strike out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action; it states only that 'the claim is struck out' because it was not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.