Case 3200185/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Farzan Haji Khani v APG Recruitment Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200185/2020
- Decision date
- 1 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Farzan Haji Khani
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded in the absence of both respondents and accepted Mr Haji Khani's oral evidence as truthful. It found that he worked for APG as an agency worker and that CrediPay also employed him for payroll purposes, so both respondents were jointly and severally liable. The tribunal rejected the suggestion that he was self-employed or that the contract wording excluded holiday pay.
The sick pay claim for two weeks in July 2019 was out of time, but the tribunal allowed it under s.23(4) ERA 1996 because Mr Haji Khani had only recently come to the UK, spoke limited English, and did not know he might claim until about December 2019. It accepted that he had been absent as claimed and awarded £696, being two weeks at £348 per week.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that he had not been paid for any time away from work. It found that eight months' work produced about 3.75 weeks' entitlement and that the claimant's calculation using the government website was more accurate than the tribunal's approximate figure, so it awarded £1,330. For the weekly deductions, the tribunal found no evidence authorising deductions and accepted that £17.65 a week had been taken, totalling £706; it also noted that the apprenticeship levy is payable by employers, not employees. The total award was £2,732, jointly and severally against both respondents.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Two weeks' sick pay in July 2019; the tribunal allowed the claim out of time under s.23(4) ERA 1996 and awarded two weeks at £348 per week. | Upheld | — | £696 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay outstanding at the end of employment; the tribunal accepted the claimant's calculation from the government website and awarded £1,330. | Upheld | — | £1,330 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Weekly deductions of £17.65 described as a management fee and apprenticeship levy; the tribunal accepted a total deduction of £706 and noted that apprenticeship levy is payable by employers, not employees. | Upheld | — | £706 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,732
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.