Case 3200203/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Tatwani v Singular Intelligence Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200203/2024
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Tatwani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mrs S Tatwani, was employed by Singular Intelligence Limited from 18 July 2022 until 10 November 2023 and presented a claim on 24 January 2024 for breach of contract (notice pay), unpaid wages and other payment, totalling £11,804.59. By its response, the Respondent admitted owing the Claimant £6,981.75 in unpaid wages.
On the basis of that admission, Employment Judge Moor gave judgment for £6,981.75 to be paid by the Respondent to the Claimant. The balance of the claim, amounting to £4,822.84 in further notice or wages payments, remained in dispute between the parties.
The outstanding dispute was reserved for a final hearing listed for 15 May 2024, with separate case-management orders made for its preparation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment given on the Respondent's admission that it owed the Claimant unpaid wages of £6,981.75. | Upheld | — | £6,982 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay/further wages dispute of £4,822.84 not determined at this hearing; listed for a final hearing on 15 May 2024. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,982
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.