Case 3200205/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs E McDonald v Keltbray Management Service Limited — 2022

Case reference: 3200205/2022
Decision date: 8 August 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Russell Members
Venue: East London Hearing Centre
Panel members: Ms S Harwood, Ms P Alford

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs E McDonald

Respondent

Keltbray Management Service Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mrs E McDonald brought claims against Keltbray Management Service Limited, heard at East London Hearing Centre on 3, 4 and 5 August 2022 before Employment Judge Russell sitting with Ms S Harwood and Ms P Alford. The extracted judgment identifies the parties and hearing dates but does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasoning in the material provided here.

By judgment dated 8 August 2022, the tribunal stated that all claims failed and were dismissed. No monetary award was recorded, and the extracted text does not identify any separate remedy, liability split, or findings beyond the final dismissal.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The extracted judgment text only states that all claims failed and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim in the material provided.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The extracted judgment text only states that all claims failed and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim in the material provided.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.