Case 3200210/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J. Osborne v Churchill Tax Advisers Limited T/A Churchill Tax Advisers — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200210/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J. Osborne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J. Osborne brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages and a claim that her dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal recorded, under Rule 21, that the unlawful deduction complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim, finding that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract as to notice. It ordered Churchill Tax Advisers Limited T/A Churchill Tax Advisers to pay damages of £550.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that this complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £550. | Upheld | — | £550 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.