Case 3200217/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Azeem v Crownguard Security Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200217/2023
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Azeem
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Azeem brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Crownguard Security Services Ltd. The respondent did not appear at the hearing. Employment Judge J S Burns found that the claimant had worked for the respondent and had been underpaid for work done between 18 July 2022 and 18 October 2022.
The reasons set out a schedule of the amounts due for each period, including £1,200 for work from 18 July 2022 onwards, £2,655 for August 2022, £2,400 for September 2022 and £1,440 until 18 October 2022. The schedule also recorded sums actually received for some periods, totalling £2,846.57. The tribunal calculated the amount payable as £7,388.39 less £2,846.57, producing the award of £4,541.82.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £4,541.82 by 28 July 2023. No separate breakdown of the award was given beyond that single figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found the claimant had been underpaid for work done between 18 July 2022 and 18 October 2022. The award was calculated from the schedule in the reasons. | Upheld | — | £4,542 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,542
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.