Case 3200220/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Wheatley v Abreo Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200220/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Wheatley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at East London Hearing Centre, heard by video on 17 June 2024 before Employment Judge Volkmer, found that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. The judgment records that the respondent was Abreo Group Ltd and that the claimant, Mr B Wheatley, appeared in person.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Wheatley £181.32 as damages for breach of contract. It explained that the figure had been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for accounting for any tax payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The complaint was expressly stated to be breach of contract in relation to notice pay. The tribunal awarded damages of £181.32, calculated using gross pay because of the likelihood that the amount would be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £181 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £181
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.