Case 3200252/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Patel v Big Easy Restaurants Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200252/2023
- Decision date
- 2 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public on 2 February 2024 at East London Hearing Centre, held via CVP, Employment Judge Reid struck out Mr M Patel's claim against Big Easy Restaurants Limited under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c). The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms V Rylatt, solicitor, by telephone due to camera issues.
The reason recorded for strike out was that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's orders made on 12 July 2023 and sent to the parties on 2 August 2023. Those orders required disclosure of his documents and production of a witness statement. The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying pleaded claim type(s) beyond referring to 'the claim' generally.
No remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out at this preliminary stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded claim type(s); it only records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.