Case 3200252/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sarah Burrows v Weston’s Bakery Limited and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200252/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Sarah Burrows
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 17 June 2024 at East London Hearing Centre by CVP, before Employment Judge Park, the tribunal held that the correct respondent was Weston’s Bakery Limited. The claims against the second respondent, Christine Weston, and the third respondent, Patrick Weston, were dismissed.
The claimant's claims that she was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment, notice pay, and accrued untaken holiday pay were all found to be well founded and succeeded. The judgment records separate awards of £4,259.18 for statutory redundancy pay, £2,096.54 for notice pay, and £465.75 for holiday pay.
The total amount ordered against Weston’s Bakery Limited was £6,821.47. The judgment does not record any other monetary components such as a basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings, or interest.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim to a statutory redundancy payment succeeded and ordered Weston’s Bakery Limited to pay £4,259.18. | Upheld | — | £4,259 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's notice pay claim succeeded and the tribunal ordered Weston’s Bakery Limited to pay £2,096.54. | Upheld | — | £2,097 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim in respect of accrued untaken holiday pay succeeded and the tribunal ordered Weston’s Bakery Limited to pay £465.75. | Upheld | — | £466 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,821
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.