Case 3200256/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Corrons Martin v Sheer Jobs Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200256/2023
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Whittall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Corrons Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr E Corrons Martin brought claims for notice pay and unpaid holiday leave against Sheer Jobs Ltd. The hearing took place on 27 July 2023 before Employment Judge E Whittall at East London Hearing Centre via CVP, with both parties appearing as litigants in person.
The tribunal recorded the notice pay claim as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, so it made no substantive finding on that issue. It found the unpaid holiday leave claim well-founded under the Working Time Regulations 1998, Regulation 14, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,323.96 gross by 10 August 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records the notice pay claim as "dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant". | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the unpaid holiday leave claim well-founded under the Working Time Regulations 1998, Regulation 14, and ordered payment of £1,323.96 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,324 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,324
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Working Time Regulations 1998, Regulation 14
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.