Case 3200256/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Tomaszewski v Tech Soul Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200256/2024
- Decision date
- 1 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Tomaszewski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not attend the hearing and had entered no response. Employment Judge Reid, sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 1 August 2024, found that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from the Claimant's wages contrary to s13 Employment Rights Act 1996 by deducting employee pension contributions of £58.15 per month across 13 months (January to August 2022, December 2022, and July to October 2023) and failing to pay those contributions into the NEST pension scheme, totalling £755.95.
The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of his terms of employment contrary to s1 Employment Rights Act 1996, and made an additional award of 4 weeks' pay under s38 Employment Act 2002, amounting to £2,269.20. The Tribunal also made a declaration that the Respondent had failed to issue itemised payslips for the months of employment between January 2017 and October 2023 contrary to s8 Employment Rights Act 1996. The total sum payable was £3,025.15, due within 14 days under Rule 65 of the Tribunal Rules 2013.
The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction over the Claimant's wages claim in respect of unpaid employer pension contributions, and that claim was dismissed. The Tribunal also noted it had no legal powers in relation to the Respondent's failure to account to HMRC for tax and NICs deducted in August, September and October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deductions contrary to s13 Employment Rights Act 1996: employee pension contributions of £58.15 deducted across 13 months (Jan-Aug 2022, Dec 2022, Jul-Oct 2023) but not paid into the NEST pension scheme. | Upheld | — | £756 |
| Other | Failure to provide written statement of terms of employment contrary to s1 Employment Rights Act 1996; additional award of 4 weeks' pay under s38 Employment Act 2002 (4 x £567.30). | Upheld | — | £2,269 |
| Other | Failure to issue itemised payslips for all months of employment between January 2017 and October 2023 contrary to s8 Employment Rights Act 1996; Tribunal made a declaration to this effect (no monetary award attached to this claim). | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Wages claim relating to unpaid employer pension contributions dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,025
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s38 Employment Act 2002
- s8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 65 of the Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.