Case 3200263/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Rasa Zigelyte v Barclays Bank UK plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200263/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- London East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Rasa Zigelyte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct sex discrimination, direct age discrimination and direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
For the acts identified at paragraphs 3a and 3b of the Agreed List of Issues, the Tribunal found that the complaints had not been presented within the time limit in section 123(1)(a) of the Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The remaining direct discrimination complaints were found not to be well founded and were dismissed.
The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. Parts relating to paragraphs 3a and 3b of the Agreed List of Issues were out of time under section 123(1)(a), and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time; the remaining complaints were not well founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. Parts relating to paragraphs 3a and 3b of the Agreed List of Issues were out of time under section 123(1)(a), and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time; the remaining complaints were not well founded. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. Parts relating to paragraphs 3a and 3b of the Agreed List of Issues were out of time under section 123(1)(a), and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time; the remaining complaints were not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.