Case 3200303/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Makokha v Woodrow Mercer Healthcare Limited FINAL HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200303/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Makokha
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Makokha brought a breach of contract claim seeking notice pay under article 4 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. The case was heard remotely on 4 September 2023 before Employment Judge Shore, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not appearing.
The tribunal held that the claim failed because the claimant was not an employee of, or worker for, Woodrow Mercer Healthcare Limited. On that basis, the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the notice pay claim under the extension of jurisdiction order.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment records only that the breach of contract claim failed for lack of employee or worker status.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim was for failure to pay notice pay under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. The tribunal held that the claimant was not an employee or worker of the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.